Abstract
As we move toward an AI-first future, Security as Code (SaC) is becoming a cornerstone of modern DevSecOps—especially when integrated with automation platforms like Jenkins. By embedding automated security checks, real-time threat detection, and compliance enforcement directly into CI/CD pipelines, organizations can shift from reactive to proactive security. This enables consistent and secure software releases at scale.
Integrating SaC in Jenkins with AI-Powered Automation
This session explores practical strategies for implementing SaC within Jenkins pipelines using AI-driven automation. Key techniques include:
- Static and dynamic analysis
- Policy-as-Code (PaC)
- Risk-based vulnerability prioritization
Enhancing Security with Machine Learning
Machine learning significantly augments SaC by enabling:
- Intelligent threat detection - Contextual risk scoring - Adaptive policy enforcement
These capabilities allow for more precise, real-time responses to security threats, reducing false positives and aligning enforcement with organizational risk tolerance.
Real-World Use Cases
Through real-world examples, we’ll demonstrate how integrating Jenkins and AI-powered SaC can:
- Strengthen regulatory compliance
- Improve incident response
- Foster collaboration between development, security, and operations teams
Looking Ahead: Intelligent and Scalable DevSecOps
This talk offers a forward-looking perspective on building resilient, scalable, and intelligent DevSecOps practices. By embracing Security as Code in an AI-first environment, organizations can empower teams to deliver secure software faster—without compromising agility or innovation.
Transcript
This transcript was autogenerated. To make changes, submit a PR.
Hello everyone.
Welcome to Con 42.
My name is, I'm a senior DevOps consultant with over 15 years
of experience in IT industry.
My areas of expertise include CICD automation, infrastructure
as code cloud native solutions, and more recently governance and
security within DevOps workflows.
What I'm especially passionate about is helping teams build pipelines that are
not just fast and automated, but also secure and compliant from the start.
Today security can no longer be something we bolt on at the end of development.
It's no longer enough to have a manual reviews, static checklist,
or gates that delay delivery.
As of infrastructure, applications and operations move faster,
powered by automation and cloud native technologies and DevOps.
Security must move just as fast.
This is where security as code comes in.
Security as code means.
We input security principle and control directly into the code
pipelines and infrastructure we deploy.
It's about automating trust.
It's about trading security, not as an obstacle, but as an integrated,
continuous, and a measurable part of the way we build and run technology.
Trey, I'm going to walk you through why security of code is essential,
how we transform risk management into proactive discipline, and how
organization that embrace it, not only safer, they are faster, more resilient,
and better prepared for the future.
Today's rapidly evolving software landscapes, security can no
longer be an afterthought.
Security as a code is revolutionizing how we approach software security
by embedding it directly into the continuous integration and
continuous deployment pipelines.
Instead of treating security as a post development task, security
as a code automates checks.
For the security within every phase of the development lifecycle,
ensuring vulnerabilities are detected and addressed in real time.
This integration not only ensures consistence, scalable security
practices across all stages of our development, but only accelerate.
Involve innovation by eliminating traditional security bottlenecks with
security as a code, teams can focus on building features while maintaining a
robust security posture, all without slowing down the deployment process.
The true power of security as a code lies in its ability to offer a real time
visibility into a system security posture.
Enabling teams to proactively address risk before they escalate by scaling
security alongside applications.
Security as a code ensures that growing system can remain secure and
resilient In the world where speed and agility are paramount, secure as
a code is in just a best practice.
It's essential enabler of fast, secure, and efficient after delivery.
As we move forward, integrating security into our deployment pipelines
is in just a choice, is the future of a secure software delivery.
So what is the challenges that we have?
The challenges is the speed versus security.
In today's fast-paced software development, world speed is crucial.
Businesses demand quicker delivery cycles to stay competitive, and teams
are under constant pressure to release software faster than ever before.
However.
This agency often comes at a cost security.
Traditional security approaches typically implemented as an afterthought, and
at the end of development process create significant bottleneck that
disrupts the flow of development and slow down the release cycles was still.
Relying on manual and inconsistent security practices can lead
to serious vulnerabilities slipping through the cracks and
reaching production environments.
This compromises both the speed of development and the safety of the product.
The challenge then is finding a balance between the rapid delivery
and a robust security, ensuring that innovation does not come at an expense
of safeguarding against the risk.
What is the impact of the security of the code Organization that
successfully integrates security of a code into their development Practices
are seeing remarkable results.
In fact, studies show that significant percentage of organization that
mature dev six ops programs have automated security frameworks directly
embedded into their CI ICD pipelines.
This not only enhances the security, but also leads to a faster remediation
of critical vulnerabilities compared to the traditional security approaches.
Security as a code drastically reduces the time it takes to address an issue.
Enabling teams to fix vulnerabilities before they escalate into the
bigger problems beyond quicker remediation, security as a code
significantly improves the overall security posture of an enterprise.
Those with a mature security support practices report far fewer security
incidents and enhance compliances outcomes, reducing risk across the board.
Additionally, by integrating the security seamlessly into the development process,
organizations can accelerate delivery with their compromising the security standards.
Team are able to deploy more frequently, keeping up the demand for a rapid release
while maintaining a high level of safety.
So what's the theoretical foundation of security of code as the heart
of security as a code lies a foundation built on automation.
I. Consistency and an early integration.
One of the core principle of security as a code is ous feedback, automated
security scans that provide developers with the immediate actionable insights.
This approach ensures that security is continuously monitored and
vulnerabilities are caught before they can even become issues.
Additionally, security controls are treated as a first class
artifacts, meaning they are codified.
Version control and subject to peer review and rigorous testing.
Just like any other piece of code, a key tenant of security as a code
is a shift left principle, which most security integration earlier
in the development life cycle.
By addressing security from the beginning, organizations can
avoid costly and time consuming remediation later in the process.
Another foundational element is immutability.
Security controls are defined once and deployed consistency
across all environments, ensuring a uniform security posture.
This is similar to the principle of infrastructure code where automated
version control methodologies are applied to a security allowing for a
greater consistency and reliability.
Researchers show that organization embracing the immutable
security controls experience 94.
Percentage fewer security misconfiguration across environments and reduce
compliances verification efforts by as much just 78 percentage.
This data underscores how security as a code can significantly
improve security posture while reducing optional complexity.
What is the economics of a shiftless security?
Let's talk about that.
The financial impact of integrating security early in the
development process is undeniable.
Research reveals that vulnerabilities directed during the design
phase cost an average of just approximately $25 to remediate.
In contrast, this.
Costs skyrockets is over $5,000 during the testing, and over approximately
$15,000 during the implementation and a staggering cost of dollars 75,000
approximately during the production.
This creates a dramatic 3000.
Dollars fold 3000 times fold differences in the remediation
costs between the earliest and the latest stages of detection.
This tax contrast illustrates why adopting shift left security and
burdening the security controls early.
The development lifecycle makes not only technical sense,
but also a financial sense.
By identifying and addressing the security issues during the design phase,
organizations can avoid escalating costs, reduce the risk of breaches, and
ultimately save significant resources.
This financial case reinforce the importance of prioritizing security
for our outset, making it a critical component of a cost effective.
Efficient development strategy.
So let's talk about the implementation in the Jenkins pipeline.
Implementing a security as a code in the Jenkin pipelines involves
several key integrations that helps automate and enforce security
throughout the development lifecycle.
First, security scanning integration plays a crucial role by integrating
static application security.
Software COMPOSTION analysis, dynamic application security
testing, and container scanning stages into your Jenkins pipeline.
Using a declarative syntax, security scans are automatically
triggered with every build.
Ensuring vulnerabilities are identify early and next.
The policy as a code implementation allows the teams to define
security vulnerabilities in the declarative languages.
These policies verify configuration and enforce compliances
automatically ensuring.
Security standards are consistently applied across all the environments.
The secret management is also critical By implementing a secure credential
storage and a retrieval mechanism, teams can prevent exposure of a sensitive
information, ensuring that credentials are security handled throughout the pipeline.
Finally, compliance verification is integrated by defining compliance's
rules as a code, which are then validated during the pipeline execution.
This ensures that every artifact passing through the pipeline is compliant
with the necessary regulatory and the security standards, offering a
realtime feedback to the developers and mitigating the compliances risk.
So what's the security scanning benefits?
The security scanning benefits.
Integrating security scanning tools into the Jenkins pipeline
can dramatically enhance an organization's security posture.
Research shows that organizations leveraging these tools identify
vulnerabilities 17 times faster than those relying on a periodic manual.
Security reviews.
This period is crucial, especially as a gap between the vulnerability,
discovery, and the active exploitation continues to shrink in today's
rapidly evolving threat landscape.
By incorporating automated scans, vulnerabilities can be detected
and remediated much easier.
By much earlier, significantly reducing the risk of breaches.
The comprehensive coverage is another major benefit.
By utilizing a combination of a scanning approaches, our organization
gains robust protection against a wide range of threat vectors.
Static application security testing to identify.
An average of 26 potential vulnerabilities per thousand lines of code, offering
a deep insight into the code quality and the security f flos software.
COMPOSTION analysis scanners focus at evaluating third party
dependencies, which make up around 80% of modern application code.
Ensuring that known vulnerabilities in these components are
flagged before they cause harm.
Lastly, the container scanning has proven to be highly effective
in preventing 60% of the security incidents that stem from deploying uns
scanned or insecure container images.
This comprehensive approach ensures that security is embedded throughout
the development pipeline, providing defense against a wide variety of risk.
So what's the organizational transformation on this?
The shift of a security as a code doesn't just impact the technology.
It drives the organizational transformation as well.
One of the most significant changes is the breakdown of silos between
security and the development teams.
Study shows that 78 percentage or 79 percentage of organization reports
significantly improved collaborations between these team resulting in a faster
delivery of a secure applications.
This collaboration is essential for ensuring that security is integrated
seamlessly into every stage of the development cycle, reducing the friction
and the accelerating time to the market.
Another critical shift is in the security role evaluation.
I'm sorry.
So evolution security professionals are transitioning from being gatekeepers to
enablers as an automation and a security scanning take over manual reviews.
Security teams spend around 62% less time on the manual task and
are able to focus 48% of most strategic architecture planning.
This allows them to focus on a proactive security measures, aligning
securities with the business goals.
In tandem, developers are gaining ownership of the security with the
right tooling and training developers are now solving 77 percentage of
security issues on their own without needing to involve a security team.
This shift of culture empowers developers to take responsibility for security
early in the development cycle.
Finally, organizations are seeing improved metrics with over 75% of reduction.
In the meantime to remediate the vulnerabilities, significantly
shrinking the windows of exposure to the potential threats.
So what are the challenges on the implementation on these?
While security as a code offer numerous benefit, its implementation
is not without challenges.
Technical complexity is one of the most significant hurdles.
Research shows that 78% of organization face substantial technical obstacles.
In their DevSecOps journey.
With the complexity of tool integration being the primary challenge, a key issue
is that only 36% of security tools offer robust API capabilities, sustainable or
suitable for the C seamless integration into the CICD pipelines, making it
a difficult to automate security checks effectively and consistently.
Another critical challenge in the skill gap, a striking 82% of organizations site.
Talent shortages as a major obstacle.
Effective security as a code implementation requires an
expectance in the development, security, and the automation.
A skillset that is often difficult to find in the traditional roles without the
right talent organization struggles to implement and maintain the security as a
code practices effectively for companies in the highly regulated industries.
Government requirements present.
Another big challenge.
67% of these organizations reports extend the timelines for
security as a code implementation.
During to compliance concerns, auditors unfamiliar with the audit date or
automated security controls often face difficulties in understanding
and validating these controls, which can slow down the adoption process.
Lastly, cultural resistance is common.
71% of security professionally, initially worried about that
automation will diminish their role.
While 68% of developer resist adding extra pipeline steps,
fearing that it may slow down the delivery, overcoming these cultural
barriers is crucial for a successful implementation of so security as a code.
So let's talk about the adaption journey.
The journey of a security of a code unfolds in several distinct phases,
each with its own set of challenges and opportunities during the resistance phase.
The first 90 days team often questions the business value of security as a code raise
concern about the technical complexity and the fear that will be slowing down the
delivery cycles by up to 23 percentage.
In fact, 84% of organization reports facing initial pushback.
This phase is crucial for addressing concerns, demonstrating the value of
security as a code, and aligning the stakeholders in an experimented phase
About 92, 180 days, teams begin to implement the targeted pilots integrating
two to three baseline security tools.
These early efforts often result in 41 percentage of detection, rate
of vulnerabilities with minimal disruption and existing pipeline.
This stage is focused on testing, learning, and refining the security
process before broader implementation by the acceleration phase.
180 to 1 365 days.
Security as a core option expands significantly with 65% of development
teams implementing compressive and comprehensive security control, including
the S-A-S-D-D-A-S-D, and SCA tools.
This results in a 57% of reduction in the critical vulnerability, showcasing
the power of security as a code in a significantly improving security while
maintaining the development velocity.
Finally, in the optimization phase, that is beyond the 365 days mark team
focus on streamlining the process and reducing the inefficiency.
False positives drop by 60 percentage.
The organization established a matrix dive and governance that shows a 79% of
improvement in overall security posture.
High performing organization accelerate their journey
through three key strategies.
First, by established in the dedicated center of excellence, which is
71% of successful organization.
Implement the second one by investing in the robust developer
security training averaging around 32 hours annually per developer.
And the third by creating an incentive programs that reward secure coding
practices with measurable results.
So what's the future of security as a code Looking ahead, security as a code is PO
to evolve beyond its current practices.
Driving even greater security automation under RES today, security
has a code implementation focus on foundational practices like a
basic scanning integration, policy enforcement, and the security
management within the CICD pipelines.
These foundational practices ensure that security is embedded early and
continuously throughout the development lifecycle, providing essential safeguard
of the applications as we move forward.
The evolution of a security code will introduce more advanced practices such
as a security Charles engineering, and a continuous verification in this
generation, security controls will undergo a regular testing through SI simulated
attack within the pipeline, allowing teams to assess and effectiveness of
the security measures in the real time.
This dynamic, proactive approach will ensure.
Security is continuously validated and reinforced as a part of development
cycle, not just the point of a deployment.
Looking even further into the future, AI driven security automation
will transform and landscape.
Emerging technologies will enable predictive vulnerability detection,
offering an early warnings before the vulnerabilities even emerge
as well, and automated remediation suggestions that allows the team to
quickly address potential risk content.
Context of our security policies will be enforced across the entire development
lifecycle, ensuring that security measures evolve dramatically, drastically, and
dynamically with the changing needs of a application and the threat landscape.
As deployment environments grow increasing complex and the threat landscape evolves,
the automation consistency and the scalability offered by the security
as a code will become indispensable.
For organizations, this capability will enable teams to maintain both security
and the agility, ensuring that software delivery remains fast, reliable, and
safe, ever-changing digital world.
That should be all for now.
Thank you.