Transcript
This transcript was autogenerated. To make changes, submit a PR.
Hello everyone.
Thank you for joining today.
My name is Terrance Stan, Joseph Ra and I specialize in enterprise data
architecture, cloud data engineering, and AI driven business intelligence.
Let me start with a simple question.
Have you ever had to wake up in the middle of the night because
your data pipeline broke?
The dashboard for the morning meeting is empty and everyone is waiting for answers.
This is not right for many engineers and managers.
This happens again and again.
Instead of building new solutions, we spend our time firefighting
and fixing broken system.
But what if you could change that?
What if our system could detect problems before they spread, fix themselves and
free us to focus on real innovation.
Today, I want to share how we can move from what I call pipeline
health to platform paradise.
I will walk you through the problem we face in the hidden cost and the solution.
Which is building a self-healing, metadata driven data platform.
Let's begin.
Many of us have faced the maintenance crisis.
Your small change in an upstream system like adding a single new field can
break dozen sub pipelines, reports fail.
Dashboard stand blank and the end entire team scrambles.
Instead of delivering new features, teams waste days or weeks
finding out what broke and why.
Simple integration, which should take a few days, stretch into weeks.
Over time, technical depth piles up.
The more we build, the more fragile system becomes.
The crisis doesn't just hurt developers.
It hurts business too.
Decision makers lost.
Trusting dashboards, delays, means missed opportunities.
What should be the strength?
Data driven insights, but it becomes a weakness.
The problem here was in clumsy coding or bad luck.
The problem is steep.
The architecture itself was fragile.
Unless we rethink how systems are redesigned, these
midnight calls will never yet.
Traditional data systems usefully follow your simple ETL model.
The extract, transform, and load.
On paper, it looks fine, but in practice this model hides big cost.
The first fit and cost is speed.
Engineering velocity drops because even small changes need
coordination across many teams.
Adding a customer field may procure updates in multiple systems.
The second cost is operations.
As the number of pipelines grows linearly, the complexity goes much faster.
Each new pipeline makes the system harder to maintain.
Teams spend more time keeping.
World systems are live than building new ones.
The third cost is quality problems often so up late.
After the data has been already used for important business and decisions,
fixing them feels like detective work and the business losses confidence.
These are in just technical headaches.
These are business problems and reliable data means lower decisions,
missed chances and reduced competition.
What seems like a small system issue can hold back the entire organizations.
There are two more hidden costs.
We often overlook the fastest developer experience.
New team members face a steep learning curve.
The system is too complex for one person to fully understand.
Senior engineers become bottlenecks because they are the only one
who knows the fragile details.
This makes self-service almost impossible.
The second is scalability.
As the data grows, traditional system hit performance was scaling
doesn't make things smooth.
But it makes them heavier.
Often, the only way forward is expensive.
Rates are messy patches that increase complexity.
Further, these issues are like a hidden tax.
Every new feature cost more to bill.
Every change takes longer.
Over time, this tax slows down the business and frustrated teams.
So pipeline here is in just about late net failures.
It is also about slower projects, rising costs, and unhappy engineers.
If you want a better feature, we need a smarter design that scales
without thought creating more pain.
In the turning point comes when we look at metadata in a new way.
Met data is simply data about data, things like schema, rules,
lineage and configurations.
In most systems, metadata is scattered.
Some is in document.
Some in code and some in people's heads.
Because of this, the system cannot react automatically to changes.
But what if you treat metadata as the foundation of the platform?
Think of it like the nervous system in the human body.
Your body reacts automatically when you touch something hot, it does not wait
for your brain to write new infections.
In the same way, your metadata driven system can detect changes,
adopt behavior, and stay consistent without waiting for humans.
It becomes self our and self-healing.
This simple shift making metadata, your first class situ, citizen turns
fragile pipelines into strong platforms.
It reduces firefighting and gives teams the confident that the system can adopt.
As things change.
Once metadata becomes the foundation, the system changes completely first.
Schema changes are no longer disaster.
Instead of pipelines, breaking the system understand what change and
adjust downstream automatically.
This means fever, suppress, and fever ate costs.
Second linear lineage tracking becomes clear.
Every piece of data can be traced back to each source.
If your problem occur, we know where it started and what was affected.
There is no need for detective work that quality checks are built in.
Rules travel with the data.
If something looks wrong, the system alerts us before the data reaches reports.
Finally, the documentation becomes self updating.
No more outdated wikis or spreadsheets.
Developers and analyst can always see first correct information.
In short, metadata turns pipelines into your living self.
Our system, instead of being fragile, the platform becomes adoptive and reliable.
It gives engineers.
More time to build new features, and it gives the business more trust in
the data that they use every day.
To make metadata driven systems real, there are four key patterns.
The first is the metadata repository.
This is a central brain of the system.
It holds schemas, lineage, quality rules, and operational details.
Everything is connected here.
The second is even driven architecture.
This means the system reacts immediately to changes when your schema changes,
when your jaw finishes, or when your quality check fails even start
triggered, and the system adapt.
The third is service miss for the data instead of big, fragile ETL jobs.
We use many small services.
Each one does a simple task well.
They connect through clear interfaces, which makes the whole
system flexible and reusable.
The fourth is policy, year score, governance rules, privacy
checks, and retention policies.
Are written as code.
They are percent tested and deployed just like any other software.
Together, these four patterns create a platform that can scale
smoothly, respond quickly, and remain reliable as the business grows.
One of the best results of this approach is a better experience
for developers instead of writing complex ETL code developer use.
Declarative data contracts, they simply say what data they need and the
system figures out how to deliver it.
Developers can also create test environments instantly when yes,
with your single command, your full environment is ready for experiments,
no longer weights, no manual setup.
Documentation is always for us because it is generated from metadata.
Teams no longer waste time updating Wiki or slides.
The system itself explained what data exceeds and how it flows.
There is also intelligent discovery.
The platform suggests useful data sets, wants of risk and
highlights, connect sense.
It's like having a smart assistant for data.
The result is clear.
Less firefighting, more building developers spend time creating
value, not fixing problems.
Productivity goes up, moral goes up, and the company benefits because engineers
are focused on innovation, not endless.
Maintenance
operations also improve with metadata driven systems.
In traditional monitoring, we track things like CP usage, memory, or job completion.
These are important, but they don't tell us if the data itself correct.
With metadata, the system can check business logic, for example.
Revenue numbers can be converted across multiple sources to make sure they match.
The system.
Also provides predictive detection.
By learning patterns from history, it can warn us when something
unusual is happening, such as a certain drop in data volume.
And when your problem does occur, the system offers automated root cut analysis.
It source exactly where the issue started and which downstream systems are affected.
These sales, our sub directive work.
With these capabilities, operations, sift from reactive firefighting
to proactive management.
Instead of waiting for things to break the system, help us stay
a again of issues and keep data flowing smoothly for the business.
Governance and complaints are often seen as barriers, but with metadata,
they become part of the system itself through policy As code rules
for data privacy, retention, and access are return into the platform.
They are tested.
And deployed like software, which makes them reliable and consistent.
This help with regulatory needs instead of relying on manual checks,
compliance is built automatically.
This means less risk and more trust as yay A is added into business intelligence.
We also need to ensure fairness and transparency
with metadata driven T design.
Bias checks and fairness rules can be part of the system.
The platform can flag when data looks unbalanced or when
models show risky patterns.
This allows companies to move faster without fear.
They can innovate, use AI, and deliver insights while still
say, staying ethical and fair.
It build confident for both engineers and decision makers.
That's very important.
In today's world, communists cannot offer to be locked into one cloud vendor.
That's true.
Metal meta trader driven architecture helps avoid that trap.
We provide agnostic pro processing.
The same logic can run on AWS, Azure or Google without rewriting.
The processing rules are separated from the cloud details, so
teams can move workloads easily.
The system also supports intelligent workload placement.
Jobs can be placed based on cost, performance, and
complaints needs, for example.
Sensitive data may run in one region for complaints while less sensitive
work is run where costs are lower.
Cross flow synchronization is also very easier.
The metadata layer tracks where data lives and how it is used
and whether it is up to date.
This ensure consistency across environment we thought endless manual effort.
This flexibility saves money, avoids vendor locking and
make the system feature flow.
As cloud providers change their offerings, the business can adapt quickly.
We without being tied down to your single vendor.
Big Bang Rerate are risky.
Instead, we use proven strategies to move toward metadata driven
platforms, step by step.
The strangler fig pattern, let us build their new systems alongside wall systems.
Over time, the new replaces the world.
We thought a big risky cutover.
The metadata boots scrub strategies are another option.
We start by collecting metadata from the existing systems we
thought changing how they work.
This gives immediate benefits, like better documentation and lineage tracking.
We can also build a center of excellence.
Your somal expert team leads the way.
Creates reference implementations and train others.
They guide the whole committee in adopting new patents.
Finally, they use incremental rollout instead of trying to do everything at
once, we start with high value areas like schema management or lineage.
Once those are stable, we expand to other capabilities.
These strategies make transformation possible, practical and less stressful.
For teams.
Success needs to be measured.
We matter the driven system.
We can track real improvements.
We have seen an 80 P percentage reduction in manual interventions.
This means engineers spend for less time fixing broken pipelines.
We have also achieved 99.9% reliability in critical PEA systems.
Dashboards and reports are available when business users
need them building trust in data.
Another key outcome is 40 percentage cost reduction.
By optimization workloads and using resources more efficiently, companies
save money while delivering more.
Those numbers are not just technical metrics.
They represent better business outcomes, faster delivery of new
features, greater confident in decision making, and more efficient use of
resources, and the improvements.
Don't stop.
Because metadata given visibility into every part of the system, teams can
keep tracking, adjusting and improving.
Continuous improvement becomes part of the culture, not a one time event.
This make the platform smarter and stronger over time.
These ideas are not just theory.
I have implemented metadata driven platforms in large enterprises,
and the results are clear.
In one case, the company achieved an 85 percentage drop in manual fixes.
Engineers were no longer spend spending their days firefighting.
Which freed them to work on new solutions.
Reliability also reached 99.9 percentage for mission critical business
Intelligence leaders could trust their dashboard knowing they would always be
available with fresh, accurate data.
On top of that, the company saved 40 per 40 percentage in cost.
By optimizing workloads across multiple clouds and making
smarter use of resources.
Most importantly, business teams moved from being reactive to proactive.
Instead of worrying about broken reports, they use data to innovate
operations and serve customers better.
This is the real impact of metadata driven platforms.
They don't just fix technical issues.
They change how the entire company uses data, creating
space for growth and innovation.
What excites me most is.
How this approach advances the whole field of data architecture.
By treating metadata as the nervous system, we have moved beyond the
world idea of pipeline as cold.
Now we think in terms of policies and transformation as metadata, the
shift makes systems more flexible, adaptive, and easier to manage.
It also brings even driven design together with metadata repositories.
Creating platforms that are self-healing.
When something changes, the system reacts automatically instead
of waiting for engineers, this is more than just improvement.
This is a new architecture, yet different way of designing enterprise systems.
It help us scale to cloud level data volumes while still keeping
system reliable and efficient.
So metadata driven design isnt just about solving today's problem, it is shaping
the future of enterprise data platforms.
It shows how companies can campaign cloud yay a and governance into
one strong adaptive system.
The future becomes even more exciting once metadata driven platforms are in place.
First, we will see yay driven optimization in the system itself will land from
patterns of use and adjust automatically.
For example, it can optimize performance or reduce cost without human intervention.
Second, we will see automated data, product creations.
Business users will simply describe what they need in natural language.
The platform will then create the pipelines and deliver the data.
We thought weeks of engineering efforts, that platform will
provide real time adoption.
As business condition change, like a sudden market shift, the system can
adjust data processing on its own.
These are not far off dreams.
These are next steps.
Once metadata is central, the foundation we laid today opens
the door to systems that not only run, but also think and adapt.
This is a real feature of enterprise data architecture.
Building this kind of platform is not just a technical shift,
it is also a cultural one.
Companies that make move to metadata driven architecture
will gain real advantages.
They can innovate faster.
Because engineers are not stuck fixing broken systems, they can run more reliably
because the platform heals itself.
They can make smarter decision because data is trusted and
they can scale without kios.
Because complexity is managed at the metadata level, the midnight
crisis may never fully disappear.
Combo systems will always face a pressure.
But the difference is how companies respond.
With metadata driven system challenges are handled smoothly and automatically.
In the end, organization that accept this change will lead
in the data driven economy.
They will turn their data from your burden into your true to advantage.
This is what it means to build the platform of tomorrow.
These approaches having stayed hidden inside one company.
They have been shared and ED widely.
They have been presented at professional conferences on forums where experts
in data and a discuss their impact.
They have been adopted as reference models by multiple global organization.
Who saw their value and wanted to copy the approach.
They have also been published as frameworks, making it easier
for companies and teams to learn from these ideas and apply them.
The fact that these practice are being repeated, reused and scaled by
others is powerful proof it source that metadata driven architecture
is not just a one off solution.
It is the best practice for modern enterprise systems.
This kind of acceptance is very important.
It shows that industry serves this value in this design, and it helps
spread the benefits to many more organizations across the world.
Thank you for spending your time with me today.
We started this task in Pipeline Health, sleepless night, broken
dashboard, and constant fighting.
Then we saw how metadata driven systems can change everything.
They detect problems adapt automatically.
And heal themselves.
We looked at real numbers.
These are not just technical wins, they are business wins.
They give leaders confident in data and give engineers the freedom
to focus on building new values.
We also looked at feature with the AA automation and real time adoption.
Metadata driven platform will keep getting smarter.
They will become the foundation for tomorrow's data driven organizations.
This is a journey from pipeline held to platform paradise.
Thank you.